TutorChase logo
IB DP History HL Study Notes

19.11.3 The Mexican Revolution and Its Leaders (1910–1917)

This segment explores the tumultuous era of the Mexican Revolution, focusing on the ideologies, aims, and methods of its central figures, and the profound constitutional transformation that ensued.

Ideologies, Aims, and Methods of Key Figures

Francisco Madero

  • Ideology: As a proponent of democracy, Madero’s liberal ideology was steeped in political rather than social or economic reform.
  • Aims: Madero's foremost goal was the ousting of Porfirio Díaz to establish democratic governance.
  • Methods:
    • Utilised electoral politics, contesting the 1910 election against Díaz.
    • When Díaz re-elected himself through electoral fraud, Madero incited the Mexican people to revolt.
  • Achievements:
    • Successful in deposing Díaz and instigating moderate political reform.
    • Elected as President of Mexico in 1911.
  • Failures:
    • His moderate stance led to discontent among more radical revolutionaries.
    • Assassinated after being overthrown by Victoriano Huerta, marking a failure to entrench democratic reforms.

Pancho Villa

  • Ideology: Villa's revolutionary ideology combined agrarianism with militarism, rooted in the need for peasant land rights.
  • Aims: He fought for significant land reforms, aiming to redistribute land to the poor and dispossessed.
  • Methods: Villa led the Division of the North, employing guerrilla tactics and rallying agrarian communities.
  • Achievements:
    • Captured key victories, most notably the decisive Battle of Zacatecas.
    • Became a folk hero, embodying the hopes of the peasantry.
  • Failures:
    • His inconsistent political alliances led to his declining influence and power.
    • Ultimately assassinated in 1923, with many of his agrarian reforms unrealised.

Emiliano Zapata

  • Ideology: Zapata was a fervent agrarian leader who vehemently advocated for land redistribution.
  • Aims: The crux of Zapata's campaign was the enactment of the "Plan de Ayala", prioritising land and liberty.
  • Methods: Zapata leveraged grassroots support and engaged in guerrilla warfare to control territories.
  • Achievements:
    • Effective control over his home state of Morelos.
    • His principles influenced the agrarian reforms in the 1917 Constitution.
  • Failures:
    • Limited his struggle to the local level, which impeded national influence.
    • His assassination in 1919 significantly weakened the agrarian movement's momentum.

Venustiano Carranza

  • Ideology: Carranza favoured constitutionalism, prioritising legal frameworks and institutions.
  • Aims: He aimed to re-establish a constitutional order post-Madero and assert national sovereignty.
  • Methods: Carranza led the Constitutionalist Army against the usurper Huerta, strategically blending military campaigns with political negotiation.
  • Achievements:
    • Oversaw the drafting and adoption of the 1917 Constitution.
    • Ascended to the presidency after Huerta’s downfall.
  • Failures:
    • Faced incessant rebellions and could not quell the revolutionary fervour.
    • Was deposed and killed in 1920, indicating a failure to consolidate his constitutional reforms.

The 1917 Constitution of Mexico

Democratic Fundamentals

  • Federal Republic: The constitution reasserted Mexico as a federal republic with powers divided among federal, state, and municipal levels.
  • Electoral Reforms: It introduced re-election prohibitions for the president and created more democratic processes for elections.

Land and Resource Control

  • Article 27: This article transformed land ownership, allowing for redistribution and stating the nation's direct ownership of underground resources.
  • Impact on Foreign Relations: The implications for foreign-owned oil companies were significant, leading to tensions and diplomatic challenges.

Labour Reforms

  • Article 123: Groundbreaking for its time, it set out the rights of workers, including the right to organize unions, strike, and receive a fair wage.
  • Women and Labour: While the constitution was progressive, it did not explicitly address women's rights in the workforce, a reflection of the period's gender norms.

Education and Secular State

  • Secular Education: Mandated secular public education, curtailing the influence of the Catholic Church in education.
  • Cultural Impact: This shift towards secularism began to shape Mexico's national identity, separating church and state affairs.

Social Rights and Policies

  • Social Welfare: The constitution was one of the first in the world to embed social rights, envisaging a responsibility of the state to ensure welfare for its citizens.

Application and Challenges

  • Varied Implementation: The radical nature of the constitution meant that its implementation was uneven and met with resistance.
  • Post-Revolutionary Mexico: While some articles were not immediately enforced, they set the precedent for future governments and reforms.

Impact and Legacy

The Mexican Revolution was a watershed moment in the nation’s history, with leaders whose diverse ideologies and strategies shaped the trajectory of the country. Their combined legacies, a blend of triumph and tragedy, laid the groundwork for the revolutionary 1917 Constitution. This document served as a blueprint for the modern Mexican state, aiming to rectify social injustices and reconfigure the political landscape. Its principles and promises, though not immediately realised, planted the seeds for enduring social change and continue to underpin Mexico's evolution as a nation.

FAQ

The economic policies under Porfirio Díaz, known as Porfiriato, were marked by modernisation efforts that favoured foreign investment and large landowners at the expense of the rural peasantry and indigenous communities. Land was concentrated in the hands of a few, while the majority of Mexicans remained landless and impoverished. The hacienda system expanded, and the disenfranchisement of common people grew, leading to a vast wealth gap. Such economic disparity and social injustice created an environment ripe for revolution, as both peasant groups and the urban working class sought to overthrow a regime that had neglected their needs for decades.

During the Mexican Revolution, women, known as Soldaderas or Adelitas, took on critical roles that ranged from combatants to camp followers who cooked, cared for the wounded, and supplied the troops. The Revolution broke the constraints of traditional female roles, allowing women to participate actively in military struggles. This period laid the groundwork for women's increased visibility in public life. Post-revolution, while the 1917 Constitution did not specifically address women’s rights, the societal shifts and the recognition of women's contributions during the conflict led to greater awareness and, eventually, to the women's suffrage movement in Mexico.

Francisco Madero's presidency was undermined by a lack of strong political alliances and his failure to satisfy the diverse interests of the revolutionary factions. His moderate reforms were seen as inadequate by more radical revolutionaries who had hoped for substantial social and economic change. Madero's inability to control the military, epitomised by his reliance on the loyalty of General Victoriano Huerta, who later betrayed him, also contributed to his downfall. This betrayal and the subsequent coup led by Huerta plunged the country back into conflict, indicating that Madero’s vision for a democratic Mexico had not been solidified, leading to his assassination and the continuation of revolutionary turmoil.

The post-revolutionary governments, particularly under Álvaro Obregón and Plutarco Elías Calles, initiated economic policies that aimed to stabilise and rebuild Mexico. These policies were more centrist and pragmatic compared to the agrarian socialist ideals of leaders like Zapata and Villa. The revolutionary leaders had sought radical land redistribution and workers' rights as part of their reform agenda. In contrast, the post-revolutionary governments implemented a mixed approach, balancing some land reforms with the need to attract foreign investment and foster economic growth. This often meant compromising on the more radical economic visions of the revolutionary leaders, which led to discontent and ongoing political instability.

The Casa del Obrero Mundial (House of the World Worker) was an influential labour organization established in Mexico City in 1912. Its role in the Mexican Revolution was primarily that of a syndicalist group advocating for workers' rights amidst the social upheaval of the time. It provided a unified voice for the working class, supporting strikes and pushing for labour reforms that were eventually incorporated into the 1917 Constitution. While it initially aligned with Venustiano Carranza against more radical revolutionaries, it later became more militant, opposing U.S. intervention and advocating for an anarchist-socialist approach to labour and governance.

Practice Questions

How did the aims and ideologies of Francisco Madero differ from those of Emiliano Zapata during the Mexican Revolution?

Francisco Madero's aims and ideologies were primarily political, striving for democratic reforms and the overthrow of Díaz to establish fair governance. He was a moderate, focusing on electoral politics and institutional change. In contrast, Emiliano Zapata was a staunch agrarian revolutionary. His primary aim was the land redistribution to peasants, encapsulated in his 'Plan de Ayala'. Zapata’s methods were localised, using guerrilla tactics to influence his home state of Morelos profoundly. While Madero's approach was top-down, seeking national electoral reforms, Zapata's was bottom-up, focusing on the immediate needs of the rural population.

Evaluate the effectiveness of the 1917 Constitution in addressing the issues that had led to the Mexican Revolution.

The 1917 Constitution of Mexico was a progressive document that addressed several issues central to the revolution, particularly land and labour. It made significant strides by incorporating social rights, such as land redistribution (Article 27) and labour rights (Article 123), which were at the heart of revolutionary demands. However, the constitution's effectiveness was hampered by inconsistent implementation across the country. While it set a visionary precedent for the state's responsibility toward social welfare, many of its radical reforms were not realised for years to come. Overall, it laid a foundation for change but did not immediately solve the problems that ignited the revolution.

Hire a tutor

Please fill out the form and we'll find a tutor for you.

1/2
Your details
Alternatively contact us via
WhatsApp, Phone Call, or Email