Self-reflection plays a crucial role in the critical review of a TOK essay. It involves examining your own biases, perspectives, and assumptions that may have influenced your arguments. Reflect on how your personal experiences or beliefs might have shaped your interpretation of the prescribed title and the knowledge issues you discuss. This introspection helps to ensure that your essay maintains an objective and balanced approach, considering multiple viewpoints and acknowledging potential biases. Furthermore, self-reflection can lead to a deeper engagement with the material, as it encourages you to consider not just what you think, but why you think it. This level of reflective thinking is essential in TOK, as it demonstrates an awareness of the complexities and subjectivities involved in knowledge production and interpretation.

Utilising feedback from peers in the critical review process involves actively seeking and thoughtfully considering their perspectives on your essay. When receiving feedback, keep an open mind and resist the urge to defend your work; instead, focus on understanding the viewpoints and suggestions offered. Take notes on the feedback, especially on points of confusion, suggestions for improvement, or areas where your peers have different interpretations. After collecting feedback, review your essay with these points in mind. Consider which suggestions align with your goals for the essay and which ones might help strengthen your argument or clarity. Remember, not all feedback will be useful or applicable, so use your judgement to decide what to incorporate. This process not only improves your essay but also enhances your skills in critical thinking, collaboration, and open-mindedness.

To ensure your essay's arguments are strong and well-supported, start by clearly defining your claims and counterclaims. Each claim should be backed by relevant and credible evidence, which could include real-world examples, scholarly sources, or theoretical models. It's crucial to critically analyse this evidence, assessing its validity and relevance to your argument. Moreover, explore different perspectives on your claims, including potential criticisms or alternative viewpoints. This demonstrates an understanding of the complexity of knowledge issues. Additionally, integrate TOK concepts and terminology appropriately, as this adds depth to your argument. Lastly, ensure your reasoning is clear and logical, avoiding fallacies and unsubstantiated assertions, to present a compelling and well-substantiated argument.

Identifying and addressing logical inconsistencies in your TOK essay involves a meticulous review of your argument's coherence and continuity. Firstly, scrutinise each paragraph to ensure that the ideas logically progress from one to the next. Look for any statements or assertions that contradict earlier points, as these can undermine your essay's credibility. To address these inconsistencies, you may need to revise or remove conflicting statements. Additionally, consider the underlying assumptions of your arguments; inconsistencies often arise from unexamined assumptions. Rework these sections to ensure that your essay presents a coherent and logically consistent argument. This process not only strengthens your argument but also demonstrates your critical thinking and reflective skills, key components of the TOK assessment.

Effectively aligning your essay with the prescribed title during a critical review involves several key steps. Firstly, re-read the prescribed title and your essay's thesis to ensure they are in sync. Every argument, example, and piece of evidence should directly contribute to exploring the title. Remove any content that deviates from this focus, no matter how interesting it may be. Additionally, consider the different dimensions and implications of the title and ensure your essay addresses these comprehensively. Look for opportunities to deepen your analysis and demonstrate a nuanced understanding of the title. This alignment not only makes your essay more relevant but also showcases your ability to engage deeply and thoughtfully with complex knowledge questions, a critical aspect of TOK.