TutorChase logo
IB DP Philosophy Study Notes

1.1.1 Individuality and Universality

Human nature, a blend of individuality and universality, offers a compelling study into shared characteristics and unique identities. This exploration into our collective traits and their inherent nature offers insights into what truly binds humanity together.

Common Human Characteristics

Biological Universals

  • Genetic Makeup: Humans share an astonishing 99.9% of their DNA, indicating our deep-rooted genetic similarities. This closeness underscores the argument that, at a fundamental level, humans are more alike than different.
  • Basic Physiological Needs: All humans experience fundamental needs such as hunger, thirst, the requirement for sleep, and reproductive urges. These needs guide and shape much of our behaviour, regardless of cultural or geographical distinctions.
  • Neural Architecture: Our brains, though moulded by individual experiences, possess consistent structures like the amygdala for emotion processing or the hippocampus for memory across the human race.

Cognitive Universals

  • Language Acquisition: Humans, irrespective of their cultural backgrounds, have an innate capability to learn and employ language. The complexity and structure inherent to all languages suggest an underlying cognitive framework common to all humans.
  • Emotion Recognition: Emotions serve as a universal language. Happiness, sadness, anger, and fear are expressed and recognised worldwide, even in cultures with minimal external contact.

Social Universals

  • Family Structures: While the concept of 'family' can manifest differently across societies, its universal presence, dedicated to caregiving and social learning, is indisputable.
  • Moral Codes: Every society, despite its unique customs and traditions, establishes some ethical or moral guidelines, indicating an inherent human inclination towards communal harmony and justice.

Theories on Inherent Human Traits

Evolutionary Psychology

  • Background: Rooted in Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection, evolutionary psychology proposes that our ancestors' survival challenges shaped modern human behaviours.
  • Inherent Traits: Characteristics like fear of dangerous animals, attraction to certain physical features, or the tendency for collaboration are believed to have evolutionary roots.
  • Critiques: Detractors argue that not every human behaviour can be traced back to ancestral survival needs and caution against reductionist views.

Psychoanalytic Theory

  • Background: Freud's groundbreaking work proposed that unconscious desires and conflicts, especially from early life stages, play a pivotal role in shaping human behaviour.
  • Inherent Traits: The id, representing primal instincts; the ego, embodying reality; and the superego, mirroring morality, are postulated as innate human structures.
  • Critiques: Modern psychology has raised questions about the theory's overreliance on early life events and its generalisability.

Humanistic Approach

  • Background: Humanistic psychology focuses on positive human potential and the quest for self-fulfilment.
  • Inherent Traits: The theory contends that humans inherently seek self-actualisation, growth, and self-awareness.
  • Critiques: The theory's optimistic lens is sometimes seen as overlooking human nature's darker facets.

Biological Determinism

  • Background: Biological determinism posits that genes largely determine human behaviours and characteristics.
  • Inherent Traits: Aspects like intelligence, temperament, or even susceptibility to certain diseases might have a predominant genetic base.
  • Critiques: Many point out the risk of neglecting the vital role of environment, upbringing, and personal experiences in shaping individuals.

Nature's Influence: A Deeper Look

Natural influences underpin much of the universality observed in human traits:

Brain Chemistry

  • Neurotransmitters: Compounds like dopamine, which governs pleasure and reward mechanisms, or serotonin, which affects mood, showcase nature's hand in universally shared human experiences.
  • Hormones: Hormones like cortisol, linked to stress responses, and oxytocin, associated with bonding and trust, further cement the biological foundation of shared human traits.

Genetic Predispositions

  • Twin Studies: Research on identical twins, even when raised apart, often underscores strong genetic influences on personality, habits, and even career choices.
  • Inherited Traits: Observations often spotlight hereditary patterns in traits like shyness, aggressiveness, or even musical aptitude.

Cultural Relativity: Counterpoints to Universality

Understanding universality demands an appreciation of cultural nuances:

  • Recognise Variance: While certain human experiences are universal, their expression and interpretation can differ immensely across cultures.
  • Avoid Overgeneralisation: Drawing overarching conclusions based on limited cultural interactions can be misleading.
  • Stay Open to Learning: Engaging with various cultures not only enriches our understanding but also highlights the vast spectrum of human nature and experience.

FAQ

Technological advancements and globalisation indeed introduce complexities to the understanding of universality. On one hand, global communication and increased intercultural exchange highlight shared human experiences, reinforcing universal traits. However, technology also allows for more individualised experiences and bubbles of information, potentially emphasising differences. Additionally, as societies become more interconnected, there's a risk of homogenising cultures, which might overshadow indigenous or unique cultural expressions. In essence, while technology and globalisation can amplify shared human experiences, they also present challenges by highlighting disparities and potentially diluting unique cultural traits.

Yes, the expression and importance placed on universally shared traits can evolve due to societal changes. While the biological underpinnings might remain consistent, the societal value or understanding of certain traits can shift. For example, while humans have always possessed the capacity for cooperation, the ways in which we collaborate and the structures we use (from tribal systems to digital networks) have transformed immensely over time. Additionally, as societal values change — say, with globalisation or technological advancements — traits once deemed universal might be expressed or prioritised differently.

Studying indigenous cultures provides invaluable insights into the vast spectrum of human experience and expression. Indigenous societies, often having developed in isolation from global mainstream cultures, offer unique perspectives on human nature, community, and the environment. By understanding their worldviews, customs, and values, we gain a deeper appreciation for human diversity. Yet, at the same time, the shared themes of community, spirituality, and connection to nature that often emerge in these cultures underline the universality of certain human experiences. Thus, indigenous cultures act as a mirror, reflecting both the profound individuality and the deep-seated universality inherent in the human condition.

Linguistic relativity, often referred to as the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, suggests that the structure and vocabulary of a language influence its speakers' worldview and cognition. This means that language can shape how individuals perceive reality, potentially influencing concepts of individuality and universality. For instance, languages that have multiple words for emotions or natural phenomena might lead speakers to perceive and categorise these differently than speakers of other languages. While the capacity for language and the underlying cognitive structures might be universal, the specificities of language can influence how we understand and express individual and collective experiences.

Indeed, while many human traits are influenced by both biology and culture, some traits, particularly emotional and cognitive ones, appear to be universal. For instance, the capacity for empathy — feeling and understanding another's emotions — seems to be a human constant, irrespective of one's cultural upbringing. Similarly, the ability to learn, reason, and solve problems is inherent to humans everywhere. However, it's worth noting that while these capacities are universal, their expression and the extent to which they are valued can be moulded by cultural factors.

Practice Questions

How do the theories of evolutionary psychology and the humanistic approach differ in their understanding of inherent human traits?

Evolutionary psychology anchors its understanding in the ancestral needs and survival challenges that shaped modern human behaviours. It posits that traits such as collaborative tendencies or specific fears are rooted in our evolutionary past, ensuring our ancestors' survival. On the other hand, the humanistic approach, championed by figures like Maslow, emphasises the innate human pursuit of self-fulfilment and growth. It contends that humans inherently strive for self-actualisation and self-awareness, focusing on the positive potential of human nature. In essence, while evolutionary psychology examines human nature through an ancestral survival lens, the humanistic approach looks at our inherent drive towards self-realisation and personal growth.

Why is it crucial to consider cultural relativity when analysing universally shared human characteristics?

Cultural relativity is indispensable when analysing universally shared human traits because while certain human experiences might be universal, their expressions, interpretations, and values can vary dramatically across cultures. Understanding these nuances prevents overgeneralisation and provides a more holistic view of human nature. For instance, while emotions like happiness or sadness might be universally recognised, their triggers or societal receptions can differ substantially across cultures. Without acknowledging cultural relativity, one runs the risk of overlooking the rich tapestry of human experience and may inadvertently perpetuate stereotypes or misconceptions about specific cultural or societal groups.

George Christofi avatar
Written by: George Christofi
LinkedIn
Oxford University - Masters Philosophy

George studied undergraduate and masters degrees in Classics and Philosophy at Oxford, as well as spending time at Yale. He specialises in helping students with UK and US university applications, including Oxbridge and the Ivy League. He writes extensively on education including on schools, universities, and pedagogy.

Hire a tutor

Please fill out the form and we'll find a tutor for you.

1/2 About yourself
Still have questions?
Let's get in touch.