TutorChase logo
IB DP Biology Study Notes

2.10.6 Niche Fundamentals and Competition

Ecological niches provide a framework for understanding how species interact with their environment and with each other. By exploring the fundamental and realised niches, the competitive exclusion principle, and the uniqueness of ecological niches, we can gain insights into species' behaviours, interactions, and their implications for biodiversity.

Distinction between Fundamental and Realised Niches

Fundamental Niche

  • Definition: The full spectrum of conditions and resources under which a species can potentially survive, reproduce, and thrive.
  • Environmental Factors: It encompasses various environmental conditions such as temperature, humidity, pH level, salinity, and more.
  • Potential Role: Not just about survival, but also about the potential role or job a species might have in an ecosystem. This could range from being a primary producer to a top predator.
  • Limitations: Even though the fundamental niche defines the 'ideal' conditions for a species, not all species can exploit their fundamental niche fully due to competition and other biotic factors.

Realised Niche

  • Definition: The portion of the fundamental niche that a species actually occupies in nature due to biotic constraints.
  • Biotic Constraints: These constraints can include competition (for food, territory, mates), predation, disease, or symbiotic relationships (like mutualism or parasitism).
  • Practical Outlook: In essence, while the fundamental niche provides a theoretical or potential outlook, the realised niche is more practical, reflecting the actual conditions under which the species exists.

Key Distinctions

  • The fundamental niche represents the "ideal world" scenario for a species without any competition or other biotic interactions.
  • The realised niche, on the other hand, is often a subset of the fundamental niche and represents the "real world" scenario, taking into account various biotic interactions.

Concept of Competitive Exclusion

Definition

  • The competitive exclusion principle asserts that two species competing for identical resources cannot coexist indefinitely. One species will inevitably have a slight advantage, which will result in a higher reproductive rate and eventual dominance.
  • This principle was derived from observations and experiments by Russian ecologist G.F. Gause.
Illustration of competitive exclusion

Stage 1 depicts a smaller (yellow) species of bird that was initially searching the entire tree for insects to eat. In stage 2, the yellow bird faces competition for resources from a larger, invasive (red) species of bird that has been introduced into the ecosystem. Stage 3 illustrates how, over time, the invasive red species outcompetes the yellow species in their struggle for the centre of the tree and the more plentiful resources.

Image courtesy of Dhanscom17

Outcomes of Interspecies Competition

  • Resource Partitioning: When two species evolve in response to the evolutionary pressure of interspecific competition, they tend to use resources in different ways. An example can be seen in birds that feed on the same tree but on different parts of the tree or at different times of the day.
  • Shift in Realised Niche: A species may alter its behaviour or habits to avoid competition. Such changes can include altering feeding times, changing territories, or even adapting physiologically to new food sources.
  • Extinction of the Less Competitive Species: If one species can't adapt quickly enough, it might face local extinction.
  • Mutualistic Relationships: In some unique scenarios, what begins as competition might evolve into a mutualistic relationship. Both species adapt behaviours that benefit not just themselves but also their former competitors.

Uniqueness of Ecological Niches

Significance

  • Each species evolves in response to both abiotic and biotic factors, resulting in a unique niche. This not only reduces direct competition but also contributes to ecosystem diversity and complexity.
  • This uniqueness is often the outcome of millions of years of evolution, shaped by natural selection and environmental challenges.

Implications for Biodiversity

  • Niche Diversity Promotes Species Diversity: A diverse array of niches can support a diverse set of species. The rainforests, for example, are a testament to this, where the availability of a multitude of niches supports a vast number of species.
  • Biodiversity Resilience: If an ecosystem has a myriad of species with varied niches, it can better withstand changes. In case one species faces decline, others can potentially step in to fill its role.
  • Ecosystem Stability: Greater niche diversity usually translates to greater ecosystem stability. Each species plays a role, and together, they contribute to the ecosystem's health and functioning.
  • Niche Overlap as a Warning Sign: Overlapping niches can indicate potential problems. If multiple species are contesting for the same resources, it may lead to fierce competition and the risk of local extinctions.

Evolution and Niche Dynamics

Co-evolution

  • As species interact over long periods, they can influence each other's evolution. For example, a predator's efficiency might drive the evolution of better defences in its prey and vice versa.
  • Co-evolution can lead to tighter niche specifications and further diversify roles in an ecosystem.
Illustration of coevolution using butterflies and birds as an example.

Image courtesy of Inspirit Learning

Niche Construction

  • Some species actively modify their environment, leading to new niches. Beavers, by building dams, create ponds which become a habitat for several other species.

FAQ

Anthropogenic, or human-induced actions, can have profound impacts on the realised niches of species. Activities such as deforestation, pollution, urbanisation, and climate change can alter the biotic and abiotic factors of an ecosystem. For instance, pollution can change the chemical composition of water bodies, impacting aquatic life. Urbanisation can fragment habitats, causing species to adapt to smaller spaces with different resources. Climate change, by altering temperature and weather patterns, can shift the distribution of species, making some areas unsuitable for species that previously inhabited them. All these actions can cause species to modify their behaviours, feeding habits, or reproductive strategies, thereby changing their realised niches.

If a species occupies a smaller niche in one ecosystem compared to another, it usually indicates stronger biotic or abiotic constraints in the former environment. Biotic constraints could include heightened competition, increased predation, or the presence of specific diseases. For example, in an ecosystem where a prey species has more predators or competitors, its niche might be restricted to specific safe or resource-abundant zones. Abiotic constraints could relate to differences in habitat conditions, such as soil quality, water availability, or temperature variations. The implication is that the species has a more limited set of resources or conditions it can exploit in one ecosystem, which might also affect its population density and reproductive success in that area.

External factors that can prevent a species from fully occupying its fundamental niche are often biotic and abiotic environmental constraints. Biotic factors can include competition from other species, predation pressures, diseases, or the presence of parasites. For instance, a plant species might have the potential (fundamental niche) to grow in both shaded and sunny areas, but due to competition with a shade-tolerant species, it might only grow in sunny areas (realised niche). Abiotic factors could be changes in climate, soil composition, water availability, or disturbances like fires or floods. These factors can alter the actual conditions a species exists under, differentiating the realised niche from the fundamental niche.

Niche partitioning is an evolutionary response where two species, which might originally have occupied identical or very similar niches, evolve to exploit different resources or use the same resources at different times or in different ways. This reduces direct competition between them. In the context of fundamental and realised niches, while both species might have a similar fundamental niche (ideal environmental conditions and resources), due to niche partitioning, their realised niches (the actual conditions and resources they utilise) will diverge. This divergence in their realised niches ensures that the species can coexist in the same ecosystem without outcompeting each other.

In theory, two species having identical realised niches in the same ecosystem would be competing for the exact same set of resources under the same conditions. According to the competitive exclusion principle, such complete overlap in niches is not sustainable in the long run. One species will invariably exhibit a slight advantage over the other, whether it's more efficient resource utilisation, faster reproduction, or better resistance to stresses. This advantage would lead to the dominance of one species, causing the other to either adapt to a different niche, migrate, or face local extinction. Therefore, while temporary overlaps might occur, lasting identical realised niches for two species in the same ecosystem are highly improbable.

Practice Questions

Explain the difference between fundamental and realised niches, and describe how interspecific competition can affect the realised niche of a species.

The fundamental niche of a species refers to the full range of conditions and resources under which it can potentially survive and reproduce. It describes the ideal environmental conditions without considering other biotic interactions. In contrast, the realised niche is the portion of the fundamental niche that a species actually occupies in the natural environment due to biotic constraints like competition, predation, and disease. Interspecific competition can significantly influence the realised niche. When two species compete for the same resources, one may outcompete the other, causing the latter to shift its behaviour, feeding times, or even its habitat to reduce the competitive pressure. This shift due to competition can lead to a change in the realised niche of the species.

Using the concept of competitive exclusion, explain why two species competing for the exact same resources cannot stably coexist.

The competitive exclusion principle asserts that two species vying for the exact same resources cannot stably coexist in the long term. If both species have identical needs and occupy the same niche, inevitably one will have a slight competitive advantage over the other. This advantage, even if minuscule, allows the dominant species to reproduce at a faster rate, utilise resources more efficiently, or withstand environmental stresses better. Over time, this leads to an increase in the population of the dominant species and a decline in the other. The species with the disadvantage will eventually be driven to local extinction or be forced to adapt to exploit different resources. Thus, complete niche overlap is unsustainable in the long run.

Hire a tutor

Please fill out the form and we'll find a tutor for you.

1/2
Your details
Alternatively contact us via
WhatsApp, Phone Call, or Email