How does the concept of sovereignty differ in failed states?

In failed states, the concept of sovereignty is often compromised due to the inability to exercise control over its territory.

Sovereignty, in its traditional sense, refers to the absolute authority a state has over its territory, free from external interference. It is the ability to govern, make laws, and enforce them within a defined geographical area. However, in failed states, this concept is often distorted or compromised due to the state's inability to exercise control over its territory, maintain order, deliver public services, or interact with other states as a full member of the international community.

Failed states are characterised by a breakdown of law and order, widespread corruption, and an inability to provide basic services to their citizens. They often lack the capacity or will to perform the fundamental functions of a sovereign state. This includes the inability to maintain monopoly over the use of force, which is a key aspect of sovereignty. In such states, non-state actors such as militias, warlords, or transnational criminal organisations often fill the power vacuum, further undermining the state's sovereignty.

Moreover, failed states often become dependent on external actors for survival, further eroding their sovereignty. This could be in the form of international aid, military intervention, or the presence of peacekeeping forces. While these interventions may be necessary to prevent humanitarian crises or regional instability, they can also undermine the state's sovereignty by infringing on its ability to govern independently.

In the international system, the sovereignty of failed states is often contested or ignored. Other states may be reluctant to recognise a failed state as a sovereign entity due to its inability to fulfil its responsibilities. This can lead to a state's isolation in the international community, further exacerbating its problems.

In conclusion, the concept of sovereignty in failed states is often compromised due to the state's inability to exercise control over its territory, maintain order, deliver public services, or interact with other states as a full member of the international community. This can lead to a state's isolation in the international community, further exacerbating its problems.