Can terrorism be considered a natural progression of conflict?

No, terrorism cannot be considered a natural progression of conflict.

Terrorism is a form of violence that is often used as a tactic in conflicts, but it is not a natural or inevitable progression of them. Conflict, in its essence, is a disagreement or clash between opposing ideas, interests, or forces. It can take many forms, from peaceful protests and diplomatic negotiations to violent confrontations and wars. However, not all conflicts escalate into terrorism, which is characterised by its indiscriminate violence against civilians and its aim to create fear and chaos.

Terrorism is a choice made by certain groups or individuals, often driven by ideological, political, or religious motivations. It is a strategic decision to use violence in a way that is intended to have a psychological impact far beyond the immediate victims. This is different from most other forms of conflict, where violence is usually directed at an opposing force and is intended to achieve a specific, tangible goal.

Moreover, terrorism often involves a rejection of the rules of warfare that most societies and cultures have agreed upon, such as the prohibition of attacks on civilians. This makes it a particularly extreme form of violence that is not a natural progression of conflict, but rather a deviation from the norms of conflict.

It's also important to note that the use of terrorism can be counterproductive to the goals of those who employ it. While it may achieve short-term objectives, such as gaining attention or sowing fear, it often alienates the very people that the terrorists are trying to influence or win over. This can lead to a hardening of attitudes and an escalation of conflict, rather than a resolution.

In conclusion, while terrorism can emerge from conflict, it is not a natural or inevitable progression. It is a specific form of violence that is chosen for its psychological impact, and it often involves a rejection of the norms and rules of warfare. Therefore, it is more accurate to view terrorism as a possible, but not inevitable, outcome of conflict.