Which methods, violent or non-violent, were quicker in achieving independence?

Both violent and non-violent methods have been effective in achieving independence, but the speed varies greatly depending on the specific context.

The speed at which independence is achieved through violent or non-violent methods is not uniform and depends on a multitude of factors. These include the political climate, the strength of the colonial power, international support, and the unity and determination of the independence movement.

Violent methods, such as armed rebellion or guerrilla warfare, can sometimes lead to a quicker independence if they manage to destabilise the colonial power to a point where maintaining control becomes too costly or untenable. For instance, the American Revolution (1775-1783) and the Algerian War of Independence (1954-1962) are examples where violent methods led to the relatively swift achievement of independence. However, these methods often come with a high human cost and can leave deep societal scars that take generations to heal.

On the other hand, non-violent methods, such as civil disobedience, peaceful protests, and diplomatic negotiations, can also lead to independence, although the process might be slower. These methods rely on building internal and international pressure against the colonial power, which can take time. The Indian independence movement led by Mahatma Gandhi is a prime example of a non-violent struggle that eventually led to independence, although it took several decades to achieve.

Moreover, it's important to note that many independence movements have used a combination of both violent and non-violent methods. For example, the struggle against apartheid in South Africa involved both peaceful protests and armed resistance. Similarly, the Irish independence movement combined political negotiations with armed rebellion.

In conclusion, the speed of achieving independence through violent or non-violent methods is highly context-dependent. While violent methods might sometimes lead to quicker independence, they often come with a high human cost. Non-violent methods might take longer, but they tend to be more sustainable and less destructive in the long run.